Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015

4.6 V8

309 hp4608 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Lightest
    2,016 kg
    4,445 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    181 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    910 km
    566 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
310hp231kW
309hp230kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
439Nm324lb-ft
Curb weight
2,016kg4,445lb
2,815kg6,206lb
Gross weight-
3,350kg7,385lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
195 km/h
121 mph
To 99% top speed
71.5s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
98.9s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
23.9s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
669km416mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
4,608cc281cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,975mm196in
Width
1,902mm75in
1,980mm78in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,955mm77in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,850mm112in
Front track-
1,650mm65in
Rear track-
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
-
Trunk volume
505L
259L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
71L
93L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
327g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V85,500 rpm3,400 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.9 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
195 km/h
121 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
134 km/h
83 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
309 hp
230 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 1 hp more than Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
439 Nm
324 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
2,815 kg
6,206 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
195 km/h
121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V88.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 2.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 6.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
669 km
416 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
309 hp
230 kW
8.6 s
195 km/h
121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
309 hp
230 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,955 mm
77.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
309 hp
230 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
309 hp
230 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
439 Nm
324 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Lightness
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
2,815 kg
6,206 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,955 mm
77.0 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
669 km
416 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
327 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km24.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi39.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year3,649 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 799 kg lighter
  • Is 2.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 44 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 241 km (150 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 246 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 146 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) 4.6 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
4.6 V8
3.6
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsCadillacXT53.6
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
4.6 V8
450d V8
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
2.0 T6
30t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace30t
4.6 V8
3.6 FSI V6
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
4.6 V8
2.5
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsToyotaRAV4 V2.5
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 T6
50 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
4.6 V8
530 TSI V6
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsVolkswagenTalagon530 TSI V6
4.6 V8
50 71 kWh
VS
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8vsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 vs Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster