Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
3.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Lightest2,016 kg4,445 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best economy score86/100
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
- Highest torque650 Nm479 lb-ft
- Largest trunk793 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,016kg4,445lb | 2,017kg4,447lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 29.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 322Nm/t216lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,747mm187in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,664mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,656mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 793L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,842L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 29.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 300 hp 224 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 2,017 kg 4,447 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | 2,017 kg 4,447 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 793 L 28.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 1 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
- Has 250 Nm more
- Has 288 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























