Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020

3.0d

300 hp2996 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2020-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Lightest
    2,016 kg
    4,445 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    910 km
    566 mi
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d

  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    755 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    63/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
Power
310hp231kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
650Nm479lb-ft
Curb weight
2,016kg4,445lb
2,083kg4,592lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
79.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
29.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
312Nm/t209lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
846km526mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,996cc183cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,747mm187in
Width
1,902mm75in
2,071mm82in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,664mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track-
1,640mm65in
Rear track-
1,656mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
213mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
755L
Max trunk volume
1,432L
1,804L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
66L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0dPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d4,000 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
29.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
155 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
300 hp
224 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
650 Nm
479 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2,083 kg
4,592 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d6.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
846 km
526 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
Power
310 hp
231 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
2,083 kg
4,592 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Length
4,747 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,664 mm
65.5 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
846 km
526 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
-
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
755 L
26.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 67 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0d

  • Has 250 Nm more
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
3.0d
30d V6
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dvsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
3.0d
2.0 P300
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
3.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.0d
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 T6
50 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
3.0d
2.0 GME
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
3.0d
50 TDI V6
VS
JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0dvsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 vs Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster