Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Best estimated range910 km566 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
- Best economy score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 247hp184kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,016kg4,445lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | 211mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | 1,336L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 63 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 63 hp (47 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 910 km 566 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 247 hp 184 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 | Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Has 63 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 160 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Is 336 kg lighter
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























