Car comparison

BMW X6 (F16) 40dvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X6 (F16)

40d

313 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2014-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph
  • Most powerful
    313 hp
    233 kW
  • Highest torque
    630 Nm
    465 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    165 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,349 km
    838 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX6 (F16)40dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
313hp233kW
310hp231kW
Torque
630Nm465lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,016kg4,445lb
Gross weight
2,820kg6,217lb
-
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
74.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
24.2s
Calculated
23.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.0s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,349km838mi
Calculated
910km566mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,909mm193in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,989mm78in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,702mm67in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,640mm65in
-
Rear track
1,706mm67in
-
Ground clearance
212mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
550L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,525L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
71L
CO2 emissions
165g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X6 (F16) 40dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • BMW X6 (F16) 40d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d4,400 rpm1,500-2,500 rpm4,650 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX6 (F16)40dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.2 s
23.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.1 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.0 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
162 km/h
101 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

BMW X6 (F16) 40d has 3 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and BMW X6 (F16) 40d: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2,016 kg
4,445 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
240 km/h
149 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d5.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 40d and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX6 (F16)40d
1,349 km
838 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX6 (F16)40d
313 hp
233 kW
5.8 s
240 km/h
149 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX6 (F16)40d
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

BMW X6 (F16) 40d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX6 (F16)40d
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
5.8 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX6 (F16)40d
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX6 (F16)40dVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
313 hp
233 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
630 Nm
465 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
5.9 s
Top speed
240 km/h
149 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,909 mm
193.3 in
Height
1,702 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,349 km
838 mi
910 km
566 mi
CO2 score
165 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
149 hp/t
111 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X6 (F16) 40dVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X6 (F16) 40d

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 230 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 439 km (273 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 89 kg lighter
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X6 (F16) 40d
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

40d
35i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (E71)35i
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
40d
40i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (G06)40i
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
40d
40d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX6 (G06 LCI)Facelift 202340d
2.0 T6
30t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace30t
40d
35d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX3 (F25 LCI)Facelift 201435d
2.0 T6
2.0 P300
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
40d
35d
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX3 (F25)35d
2.0 T6
3.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
40d
40i
VS
BMWX6 (F16)40dvsBMWX7 (G07)40i
2.0 T6
50 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
BMW X6 (F16) 40d vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster