Car comparison

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsJaguar F-Pace 30t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

30t

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 30t

  • Lightest
    1,831 kg
    4,037 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    164 hp/t
    122 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.4 L/100 km
    25.0 mpg US
    30.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    175 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,065 km
    662 mi
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JaguarF-Pace30t
Power
310hp231kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,016kg4,445lb
1,831kg4,037lb
Gross weight-
2,460kg5,423lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
72.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
23.8s
Calculated
26.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
910km566mi
Calculated
1,065km662mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,688mm185in
4,731mm186in
Width
1,902mm75in
2,071mm82in
Height
1,658mm65in
1,666mm66in
Wheelbase
2,865mm113in
2,874mm113in
Front track-
1,641mm65in
Rear track-
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance
216mm9in
215mm8in
Trunk volume
505L
-
Max trunk volume
1,432L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
71L
82L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
175g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Jaguar F-Pace 30tPowerTorque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 30t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
JaguarF-Pace30t5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JaguarF-Pace30t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
23.8 s
26.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
163 km/h
101 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
JaguarF-Pace30t
300 hp
224 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 30t.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 30t and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace30t
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
JaguarF-Pace30t
1,831 kg
4,037 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarF-Pace30t
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s
JaguarF-Pace30t6.1 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Jaguar F-Pace 30t: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace30t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace30t
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi
JaguarF-Pace30t
1,065 km
662 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarF-Pace30t
300 hp
224 kW
6.1 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
JaguarF-Pace30t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace30t
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s
JaguarF-Pace30t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace30t
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6JaguarF-Pace30t
Power
310 hp
231 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
1,831 kg
4,037 lb
Fuel consumption
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Range score
910 km
566 mi
1,065 km
662 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
175 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6Jaguar F-Pace 30t
Consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.65 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.97 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,048 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar F-Pace 30t

  • Is 185 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 155 km (96 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Jaguar F-Pace 30t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
30t
3.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace30tvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
30t
2.0 P300
VS
JaguarF-Pace30tvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
30t
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace30tvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T6
2.0t
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace2.0t
30t
50 TDI
VS
JaguarF-Pace30tvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
30t
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace30tvsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
30t
2.0 GME
VS
JaguarF-Pace30tvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.0 GME
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
30t
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
JaguarF-Pace30tvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 vs Jaguar F-Pace 30t - car comparison - FastVsFaster