Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P300

300 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    910 km
    566 mi
  • Best performance score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,894 kg
    4,176 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    181 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
300hp224kW
310hp231kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,894kg4,176lb
2,016kg4,445lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
-
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
85.0s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
23.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
856km532mi
Calculated
910km566mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,635mm64in
-
Rear track
1,634mm64in
-
Ground clearance
204mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
1,234L
505L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
71L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
181g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
23.8 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
163 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2,016 kg
4,445 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
243 km/h
151 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3006.4 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T65.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
856 km
532 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
910 km
566 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
243 km/h
151 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.4 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
2,016 kg
4,445 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
856 km
532 mi
910 km
566 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
181 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Is 122 kg lighter
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 729 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P300
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0 P300
30d V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
2.0 P300
3.0d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 P300
50 TDI V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 P300
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 T6
50 TDI
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2.0 P300
2.0 TFSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsAUDISQ22.0 TFSI
2.0 T6
40d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6vsBMWX6 (F16)40d
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster