Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6vsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
50 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lightest1,870 kg4,123 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions162 g/km
- Best estimated range1,066 km662 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,016kg4,445lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,565kg5,655lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 67.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 23.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 1,066km662mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,967cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | - | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 2,250-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 23.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 has 24 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 24 hp (18 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 5.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 910 km 566 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 1,066 km 662 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 T6 | AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,016 kg 4,445 lb | 1,870 kg 4,123 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 1,066 km 662 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6 | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 T6
- Has 24 hp more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
- Has 220 Nm more
- Is 146 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 155 km (97 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























