AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSIvsVolvo XC40 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Best estimated range933 km580 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Most powerful247 hp184 kW
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 247hp184kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Gross weight | 2,435kg5,368lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 28.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 140hp/t104kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 933km580mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 211mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,336L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 172g/km | 164g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,600-4,300 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 28.7 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 245 hp 183 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW |
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 has 2 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 6.4 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 6.5 s |
Although Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI and Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 933 km 580 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 245 hp 183 kW | 6.4 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)45 TFSI | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 247 hp 184 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,750 kg 3,858 lb | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 933 km 580 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 172 g/km | 164 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 140 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI | Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.13 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,969 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 45 TFSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 183 km (114 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























