Toyota RAV4 V
Car comparison
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5vsToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015
4.6 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions163 g/km
- Best estimated range764 km475 mi
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
- Most powerful309 hp230 kW
- Highest torque439 Nm324 lb-ft
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 309hp230kW |
| Torque | 243Nm179lb-ft | 439Nm324lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 2,815kg6,206lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | 3,350kg7,385lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 98.7s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.0s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 764km475mi Calculated | 669km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,487cc152cu in | 4,608cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,600mm181in | 4,975mm196in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,955mm77in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | 1,650mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 259L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | 327g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: Power / Torque
- Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 6,600 rpm | 4,000-5,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.0 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 134 km/h 83 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 309 hp 230 kW |
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 has 109 hp more than Toyota RAV4 V 2.5.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 109 hp (81 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 439 Nm 324 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 2,815 kg 6,206 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 195 km/h 121 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 8.5 s |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 8.6 s |
Although Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 has more power, Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 6.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 764 km 475 mi |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 669 km 416 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 309 hp 230 kW | 8.6 s | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 309 hp 230 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft | 439 Nm 324 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 2,815 kg 6,206 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 764 km 475 mi | 669 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | 327 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 259 L 9.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 | Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Is 1,130 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
- Has 321 L more trunk volume
- Emits 164 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
- Has 109 hp more
- Has 196 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























