Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015

4.6 V8

309 hp4608 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

Quickest 0-100 km/h
6.5 s
Fastest top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Most powerful
310 hp
231 kW
Lightest
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
Best power-to-weight
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
10.3 L/100 km
22.8 mpg US
27.4 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
192 g/km
Best estimated range
855 km
532 mi
Largest trunk
314 L
Best overall score
65/100
Best performance score
58/100
Best economy score
85/100
Best practicality score
79/100

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8

Highest torque
439 Nm
324 lb-ft

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power	310hp231kW	309hp230kW
Torque	400Nm295lb-ft	439Nm324lb-ft
Curb weight	2,146kg4,731lb	2,815kg6,206lb
Gross weight	-	3,350kg7,385lb
Top speed	230 km/h 143 mph	195 km/h 121 mph
To 99% top speed	81.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated	98.9s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	6.5s	8.6s
0-200 km/h	30.3s Calculated	-
0-60 mph	6.1s Calculated	8.0s Calculated
Fuel consumption	8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK	13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK	18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK	11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Quarter mile	14.6s Calculated	16.2s Calculated
Power-to-weight	144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated	110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated	156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	855km532mi Calculated	669km416mi Calculated
Displacement	1,969cc120cu in	4,608cc281cu in
Length	4,950mm195in	4,975mm196in
Width	1,923mm76in	1,980mm78in
Height	1,776mm70in	1,955mm77in
Wheelbase	2,984mm117in	2,850mm112in
Front track	1,673mm66in	1,650mm65in
Rear track	1,675mm66in	1,645mm65in
Ground clearance	238mm9in	-
Trunk volume	314L	259L
Max trunk volume	1,886L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	7
Fuel tank	71L	93L
CO2 emissions	192g/km	327g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	5,700 rpm	2,220-5,100 rpm	6,000 rpm
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	5,500 rpm	3,400 rpm	5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	6.1 s	8.0 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	6.5 s	8.6 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	30.3 s	-
Top speed	230 km/h 143 mph	195 km/h 121 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.3 s	2.4 s
330 ft 101 m	6.3 s	6.7 s
1/8 mile 201 m	9.5 s	10.3 s
1000 ft 305 m	12.3 s	13.5 s
1/4 mile 402 m	14.6 s	16.2 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	155 km/h 96 mph	134 km/h 83 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	310 hp 231 kW
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	309 hp 230 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 1 hp more than Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	400 Nm 295 lb-ft
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	439 Nm 324 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	2,146 kg 4,731 lb
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	2,815 kg 6,206 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	230 km/h 143 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	195 km/h 121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	6.5 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 2.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 5.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	855 km 532 mi
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	669 km 416 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	310 hp 231 kW	6.5 s	230 km/h 143 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	309 hp 230 kW	8.6 s	195 km/h 121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	6.5 s
Top speed 230 km/h 143 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	314 L 11.1 cu ft
Length	4,950 mm 194.9 in
Height	1,776 mm 69.9 in

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

Power	309 hp 230 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 195 km/h 121 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	259 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,975 mm 195.9 in
Height	1,955 mm 77.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6

Power	310 hp 231 kW
0-100 km/h	6.5 s
Top speed 230 km/h 143 mph

8.3 L/100 km

28.3 mpg US

34.0 mpg UK

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

Power	309 hp 230 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 195 km/h 121 mph

13.9 L/100 km

16.9 mpg US

20.3 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK	6.5 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK	8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6	144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp	8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

Power

310 hp

231 kW

309 hp

230 kW

Torque

400 Nm

295 lb-ft

439 Nm

324 lb-ft

Acceleration

6.5 s

8.6 s

Top speed

230 km/h

143 mph

195 km/h

121 mph

Lightness

2,146 kg

4,731 lb

2,815 kg

6,206 lb

Fuel consumption

8.3 L/100 km

28.3 mpg US

34.0 mpg UK

13.9 L/100 km

16.9 mpg US

20.3 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	314 L 11.1 cu ft
Length	4,950 mm 194.9 in
Height	1,776 mm 69.9 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	259 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,975 mm 195.9 in
Height	1,955 mm 77.0 in

Range score

855 km

532 mi

669 km

416 mi

CO2 score

192 g/km

327 g/km

Trunk score

314 L

11.1 cu ft

259 L

9.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

144 hp/t

108 kW/t

6.9 kg/hp

110 hp/t

82 kW/t

9.1 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6	Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
Consumption	8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK	13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	14.53 LC100 km	24.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	23.38 LC100 mi	39.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal	2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	2,179 LC/year	3,649 LC/year