Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC90 II
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Lightest1,680 kg3,704 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions164 g/km
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range855 km532 mi
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 247hp184kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,680kg3,704lb | 2,146kg4,731lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 30.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 855km532mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,950mm195in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,923mm76in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,776mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,984mm117in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,673mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 211mm8in | 238mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 314L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,336L | 1,886L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 164g/km | 192g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 30.2 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 63 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T5.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 63 hp (47 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 6.5 s |
Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has more power, Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 750 km 466 mi |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 855 km 532 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 247 hp 184 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T5 | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T5 | VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 247 hp 184 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,680 kg 3,704 lb | 2,146 kg 4,731 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 855 km 532 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 164 g/km | 192 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 314 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 144 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T5 | Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T5
- Is 466 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 146 L more trunk volume
- Emits 28 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
- Has 63 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 105 km (66 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























