Car comparison

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6vsVolvo XC90 · Facelift 2007 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019
VS

Volvo XC90 · Facelift 2007

4.4 V8

315 hp4414 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2007-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.3 L/100 km
    28.3 mpg US
    34.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    855 km
    532 mi
  • Largest trunk
    314 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
Power
310hp231kW
315hp235kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
440Nm325lb-ft
Curb weight
2,146kg4,731lb
2,080kg4,586lb
Gross weight-
2,590kg5,710lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
81.2s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
30.2s
Calculated
37.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
19.8L/100 km11.9mpg US14.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
855km532mi
Calculated
602km374mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
4,414cc269cu in
Length
4,950mm195in
4,798mm189in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,898mm75in
Height
1,776mm70in
1,743mm69in
Wheelbase
2,984mm117in
2,857mm112in
Front track
1,673mm66in
-
Rear track
1,675mm66in
-
Ground clearance
238mm9in
-
Trunk volume
314L
249L
Max trunk volume
1,886L
1,837L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
71L
80L
CO2 emissions
192g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V85,950 rpm3,950 rpm6,200 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.2 s
37.4 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
315 hp
235 kW

Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 has 5 hp more than Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
440 Nm
325 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
2,080 kg
4,586 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V87.3 s

Although Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 has more power, Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 and Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8: 5.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
602 km
374 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
315 hp
235 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
Power
315 hp
235 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,798 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,743 mm
68.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
Power
315 hp
235 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6VolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
Power
310 hp
231 kW
315 hp
235 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
440 Nm
325 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.3 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
2,080 kg
4,586 lb
Fuel consumption
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
13.3 L/100 km
17.7 mpg US
21.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,798 mm
188.9 in
Height
1,743 mm
68.6 in
Range score
855 km
532 mi
602 km
374 mi
CO2 score
192 g/km
-
Trunk score
314 L
11.1 cu ft
249 L
8.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK13.3 L/100 km17.7 mpg US21.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km23.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi37.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal1,995 L527 US gal439 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year3,491 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 5.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 254 km (158 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 65 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Volvo XC90 Facelift 2007 4.4 V8

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 66 kg lighter
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Volvo XC90 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 vs Volvo XC90 · Facelift 2007 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster