Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6vsVolvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

30d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020
VS

Volvo XC90 II

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbo + superchargedSUV2018-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,954 kg
    4,308 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    170 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,031 km
    641 mi
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace30d V6VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
300hp224kW
310hp231kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,954kg4,308lb
2,146kg4,731lb
Gross weight
2,570kg5,666lb
-
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
83.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
80.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
6.5s
0-200 km/h
26.7s
Calculated
30.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
144hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t125lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,031km641mi
Calculated
855km532mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,731mm186in
4,950mm195in
Width
2,071mm82in
1,923mm76in
Height
1,666mm66in
1,776mm70in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,984mm117in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,673mm66in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,675mm66in
Ground clearance
215mm8in
238mm9in
Trunk volume-
314L
Max trunk volume-
1,886L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
71L
CO2 emissions
170g/km
192g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace30d V64,000 rpm1,500-1,750 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T65,700 rpm2,220-5,100 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace30d V6VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
6.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.7 s
30.2 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
155 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
300 hp
224 kW
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
1,954 kg
4,308 lb
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2,146 kg
4,731 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace30d V66.4 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T66.5 s

Although Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 has more power, Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 and Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
1,031 km
641 mi
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
855 km
532 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.5 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 s
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
6.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace30d V6VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
310 hp
231 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
6.5 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,954 kg
4,308 lb
2,146 kg
4,731 lb
Fuel consumption
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,950 mm
194.9 in
Height
1,776 mm
69.9 in
Range score
1,031 km
641 mi
855 km
532 mi
CO2 score
170 g/km
192 g/km
Trunk score
-
314 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
144 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 30d V6Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.20 LC100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.02 LC100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used960 L254 US gal211 UK gal1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,680 LC/year2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6

  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Is 192 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 176 km (109 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 22 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6
Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

30d V6
3.0d
VS
JaguarF-Pace30d V6vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
2.0 T6
4.4 V8
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC90Facelift 20074.4 V8
30d V6
2.0 P300
VS
JaguarF-Pace30d V6vsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
2.0 T6
2.0 T6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
30d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace30d V6vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 T6
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
30d V6
50 TDI
VS
JaguarF-Pace30d V6vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
30d V6
50 TDI V6
VS
JaguarF-Pace30d V6vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2.0 T6
30t
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsJaguarF-Pace30t
30d V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
JaguarF-Pace30d V6vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
2.0 T6
3.6
VS
VolvoXC90 II2.0 T6vsCadillacXT53.6
30d V6
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace30d V6vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 vs Volvo XC90 II 2.0 T6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster