Car comparison

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6vsJaguar F-Pace 30d V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q8 (4M)

50 TDI V6

286 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

30d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6

  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,954 kg
    4,308 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    154 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.4 L/100 km
    36.8 mpg US
    44.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    170 g/km
  • Best overall score
    73/100
  • Best performance score
    66/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    245 km/h
    152 mph
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,103 km
    685 mi
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6JaguarF-Pace30d V6
Power
286hp213kW
300hp224kW
Torque
600Nm443lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
2,145kg4,729lb
1,954kg4,308lb
Gross weight
2,890kg6,371lb
2,570kg5,666lb
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
90.6s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
83.4s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.3s
6.4s
0-200 km/h
26.6s
Calculated
26.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.0s
Calculated
6.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.4s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton
Calculated
358Nm/t240lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,103km685mi
Calculated
1,031km641mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,967cc181cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,986mm196in
4,731mm186in
Width
1,995mm79in
2,071mm82in
Height
1,705mm67in
1,666mm66in
Wheelbase
2,995mm118in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,679mm66in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,691mm67in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance
254mm10in
215mm8in
Trunk volume
605L
-
Max trunk volume
1,755L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
75L
66L
CO2 emissions
178g/km
170g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6PowerTorque
  • AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V63,500-4,000 rpm2,250-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarF-Pace30d V64,000 rpm1,500-1,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6JaguarF-Pace30d V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.0 s
6.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.3 s
6.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.6 s
26.7 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.1 s
12.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.4 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
286 hp
213 kW
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
300 hp
224 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 has 14 hp more than AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
2,145 kg
4,729 lb
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
1,954 kg
4,308 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
245 km/h
152 mph
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
241 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V66.3 s
JaguarF-Pace30d V66.4 s

Although Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 has more power, AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 and Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
1,103 km
685 mi
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
1,031 km
641 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
286 hp
213 kW
6.3 s
245 km/h
152 mph
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
241 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,986 mm
196.3 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h6.3 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.3 s
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
6.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace30d V6
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6JaguarF-Pace30d V6
Power
286 hp
213 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.3 s
6.4 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
2,145 kg
4,729 lb
1,954 kg
4,308 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
605 L
21.4 cu ft
Length
4,986 mm
196.3 in
Height
1,705 mm
67.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Range score
1,103 km
685 mi
1,031 km
641 mi
CO2 score
178 g/km
170 g/km
Trunk score
605 L
21.4 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
154 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6

  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Is 191 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6
Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI Q8 (4M) 50 TDI V6 vs Jaguar F-Pace 30d V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster