Cadillac XT5
Car comparison
Cadillac XT5 3.6vsToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015
4.6 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cadillac XT5 3.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Most powerful314 hp234 kW
- Lightest1,931 kg4,257 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions229 g/km
- Best estimated range830 km516 mi
- Largest trunk850 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score80/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
- Highest torque439 Nm324 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | CadillacXT53.6 | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 314hp234kW | 309hp230kW |
| Torque | 368Nm271lb-ft | 439Nm324lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,931kg4,257lb | 2,815kg6,206lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 3,350kg7,385lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 98.7s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 830km516mi Calculated | 669km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,649cc223cu in | 4,608cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,815mm190in | 4,975mm196in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,675mm66in | 1,955mm77in |
| Wheelbase | 2,857mm112in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,650mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,638mm64in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 850L | 259L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,784L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | 229g/km | 327g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cadillac XT5 3.6: Power / Torque
- Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 6,700 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,400 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CadillacXT53.6 | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 134 km/h 83 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 314 hp 234 kW |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 309 hp 230 kW |
Cadillac XT5 3.6 has 5 hp more than Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 439 Nm 324 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 1,931 kg 4,257 lb |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 2,815 kg 6,206 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 195 km/h 121 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 7.5 s |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 830 km 516 mi |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 669 km 416 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 314 hp 234 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 309 hp 230 kW | 8.6 s | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Cadillac XT5 3.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CadillacXT53.6 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CadillacXT53.6 | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 314 hp 234 kW | 309 hp 230 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | 439 Nm 324 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,931 kg 4,257 lb | 2,815 kg 6,206 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 830 km 516 mi | 669 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 229 g/km | 327 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 850 L 30.0 cu ft | 259 L 9.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cadillac XT5 3.6 | Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.50 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,625 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cadillac XT5 3.6
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 884 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
- Has 591 L more trunk volume
- Emits 98 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
- Has 71 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























