Car comparison

Cadillac XT5 3.6vsToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cadillac XT5

3.6

314 hp3649 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2016-2020
VS

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015

4.6 V8

309 hp4608 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cadillac XT5 3.6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    314 hp
    234 kW
  • Lightest
    1,931 kg
    4,257 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.1 L/100 km
    16.7 mpg US
    20.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    229 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    830 km
    516 mi
  • Largest trunk
    850 L
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best economy score
    80/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCadillacXT53.6ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
314hp234kW
309hp230kW
Torque
368Nm271lb-ft
439Nm324lb-ft
Curb weight
1,931kg4,257lb
2,815kg6,206lb
Gross weight
2,550kg5,622lb
3,350kg7,385lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
195 km/h
121 mph
To 99% top speed
78.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
98.7s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
36.9s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
830km516mi
Calculated
669km416mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,649cc223cu in
4,608cc281cu in
Length
4,815mm190in
4,975mm196in
Width
1,903mm75in
1,980mm78in
Height
1,675mm66in
1,955mm77in
Wheelbase
2,857mm112in
2,850mm112in
Front track
1,638mm64in
1,650mm65in
Rear track
1,638mm64in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
-
Trunk volume
850L
259L
Max trunk volume
1,784L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
83L
93L
CO2 emissions
229g/km
327g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cadillac XT5 3.6Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8PowerTorque
  • Cadillac XT5 3.6: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CadillacXT53.66,700 rpm5,000 rpm7,200 rpm
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V85,500 rpm3,400 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCadillacXT53.6ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.9 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
195 km/h
121 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
149 km/h
93 mph
134 km/h
83 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
314 hp
234 kW
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
309 hp
230 kW

Cadillac XT5 3.6 has 5 hp more than Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
439 Nm
324 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
1,931 kg
4,257 lb
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
2,815 kg
6,206 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
195 km/h
121 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cadillac XT5 3.6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CadillacXT53.6
830 km
516 mi
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
669 km
416 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CadillacXT53.6
314 hp
234 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
309 hp
230 kW
8.6 s
195 km/h
121 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CadillacXT53.6
Power
314 hp
234 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
850 L
30.0 cu ft
Length
4,815 mm
189.6 in
Height
1,675 mm
65.9 in
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
309 hp
230 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,955 mm
77.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CadillacXT53.6
Power
314 hp
234 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
309 hp
230 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Cadillac XT5 3.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CadillacXT53.6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CadillacXT53.6
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCadillacXT53.6ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
Power
314 hp
234 kW
309 hp
230 kW
Torque
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
439 Nm
324 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
195 km/h
121 mph
Lightness
1,931 kg
4,257 lb
2,815 kg
6,206 lb
Fuel consumption
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
13.9 L/100 km
16.9 mpg US
20.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
850 L
30.0 cu ft
Length
4,815 mm
189.6 in
Height
1,675 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,975 mm
195.9 in
Height
1,955 mm
77.0 in
Range score
830 km
516 mi
669 km
416 mi
CO2 score
229 g/km
327 g/km
Trunk score
850 L
30.0 cu ft
259 L
9.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCadillac XT5 3.6Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
Consumption10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.50 LC100 km24.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.16 LC100 mi39.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,625 LC/year3,649 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cadillac XT5 3.6

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 884 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 53 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 161 km (100 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 591 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 98 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cadillac XT5 3.6
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) 4.6 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cadillac XT5 3.6 vs Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster