Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300vsCadillac XT5 3.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P300

300 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

Cadillac XT5

3.6

314 hp3649 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2016-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,894 kg
    4,176 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.0 L/100 km
    29.4 mpg US
    35.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    9.7 L/100 km
    24.2 mpg US
    29.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    181 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    856 km
    532 mi
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100

Cadillac XT5 3.6

  • Most powerful
    314 hp
    234 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300CadillacXT53.6
Power
300hp224kW
314hp234kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
368Nm271lb-ft
Curb weight
1,894kg4,176lb
1,931kg4,257lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,550kg5,622lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
85.0s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
78.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
7.5s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
36.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
7.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
191Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
856km532mi
Calculated
830km516mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
3,649cc223cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,815mm190in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,903mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,675mm66in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,857mm112in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,638mm64in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,638mm64in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
1,234L
850L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
1,784L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
83L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
229g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300Cadillac XT5 3.6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
  • Cadillac XT5 3.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
CadillacXT53.66,700 rpm5,000 rpm7,200 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300CadillacXT53.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
7.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
7.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
36.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
CadillacXT53.6
314 hp
234 kW

Cadillac XT5 3.6 has 14 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
CadillacXT53.6
368 Nm
271 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
CadillacXT53.6
1,931 kg
4,257 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
243 km/h
151 mph
CadillacXT53.6
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3006.4 s
CadillacXT53.67.5 s

Although Cadillac XT5 3.6 has more power, Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CadillacXT53.6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Cadillac XT5 3.6: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
CadillacXT53.6
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
856 km
532 mi
CadillacXT53.6
830 km
516 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
243 km/h
151 mph
CadillacXT53.6
314 hp
234 kW
7.5 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
CadillacXT53.6
Power
314 hp
234 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
850 L
30.0 cu ft
Length
4,815 mm
189.6 in
Height
1,675 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CadillacXT53.6
Power
314 hp
234 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.4 s
CadillacXT53.6
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
CadillacXT53.6
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300CadillacXT53.6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
314 hp
234 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
368 Nm
271 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
7.5 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
1,931 kg
4,257 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
850 L
30.0 cu ft
Length
4,815 mm
189.6 in
Height
1,675 mm
65.9 in
Range score
856 km
532 mi
830 km
516 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
229 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
850 L
30.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300Cadillac XT5 3.6
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km17.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi28.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year2,625 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Has 32 Nm more
  • Is 37 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 26 km (16 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 384 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 48 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power

Cadillac XT5 3.6

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
Cadillac XT5 3.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P300
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
3.6
2.0 T6
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
2.0 P300
30d V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
3.6
2.0 T6
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
2.0 P300
3.0d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
3.6
4.6 V8
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8
2.0 P300
50 TDI V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
3.6
3.0 V6 TSI
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TSI
2.0 P300
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
3.6
75D 75 kWh
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsTeslaModel X75D 75 kWh
3.6
50 71 kWh
VS
CadillacXT53.6vsAUDIe-tron50 71 kWh
2.0 P300
50 TDI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 vs Cadillac XT5 3.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster