Car comparison

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300vsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar E-Pace

2.0 P300

300 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2020
VS

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

50 TDI

286 hp2967 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.9 s
  • Highest torque
    620 Nm
    457 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,870 kg
    4,123 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,066 km
    662 mi
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Fastest top speed
    243 km/h
    151 mph
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    158 hp/t
    118 kW/t
    6.3 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    1,234 L
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
300hp224kW
286hp213kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
620Nm457lb-ft
Curb weight
1,894kg4,176lb
1,870kg4,123lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,565kg5,655lb
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
To 99% top speed
85.0s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
67.0s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.4s
5.9s
0-200 km/h
26.4s
Calculated
23.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.1s
Calculated
5.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.5s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb
Calculated
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
332Nm/t222lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
856km532mi
Calculated
1,066km662mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
2,967cc181cu in
Length
4,395mm173in
4,663mm184in
Width
1,984mm78in
1,893mm75in
Height
1,649mm65in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,819mm111in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,616mm64in
Rear track
1,634mm64in
1,609mm63in
Ground clearance
204mm8in
-
Trunk volume
1,234L
550L
Max trunk volume
2,577L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
69L
65L
CO2 emissions
181g/km
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDIPowerTorque
  • Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3005,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm2,250-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.1 s
5.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.4 s
5.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.4 s
23.8 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.2 s
11.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.5 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
164 km/h
102 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
286 hp
213 kW

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 has 14 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: 14 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
620 Nm
457 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
1,870 kg
4,123 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
243 km/h
151 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
237 km/h
147 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P3006.4 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI5.9 s

Although Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 has more power, AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
856 km
532 mi
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
1,066 km
662 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
300 hp
224 kW
6.4 s
243 km/h
151 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
286 hp
213 kW
5.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.4 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
286 hp
213 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.4 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
5.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarE-Pace2.0 P300AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDI
Power
300 hp
224 kW
286 hp
213 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
620 Nm
457 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.4 s
5.9 s
Top speed
243 km/h
151 mph
237 km/h
147 mph
Lightness
1,894 kg
4,176 lb
1,870 kg
4,123 lb
Fuel consumption
8.0 L/100 km
29.4 mpg US
35.3 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
Length
4,395 mm
173.0 in
Height
1,649 mm
64.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
856 km
532 mi
1,066 km
662 mi
CO2 score
181 g/km
162 g/km
Trunk score
1,234 L
43.6 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
158 hp/t
118 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
Consumption8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.00 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.53 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,100 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300

  • Has 14 hp more
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 684 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI

  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Is 24 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 209 km (130 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 19 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 P300
2.0i
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
50 TDI
50 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202050 TDI V6
2.0 P300
30d V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-Pace30d V6
50 TDI
3.0 TFSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20123.0 TFSI V6
2.0 P300
3.0d
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0d
50 TDI
3.0 TDI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)3.0 TDI V6
2.0 P300
50 TDI V6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsAUDIQ8 (4M)50 TDI V6
50 TDI
3.2 FSI V6
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)3.2 FSI V6
2.0 P300
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsCupraAteca2.0 TSI
2.0 P300
2.0 T6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T6
50 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)50 TDIvsAUDISQ2Facelift 20202.0 TFSI
2.0 P300
2.0 T6
VS
JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T6
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 vs AUDI Q5 II (FY) 50 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster