AUDI e-tron
Car comparison
AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWhvsToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015
4.6 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed200 km/h124 mph Unrestricted190 km/h118 mph Restricted
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lightest2,370 kg5,225 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
- Best economy score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313hp233kW | 309hp230kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 439Nm324lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,815kg6,206lb |
| Gross weight | 3,040kg6,702lb | 3,350kg7,385lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph Calculated | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.7s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated | 98.7s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 8.6s |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated | 156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 669km416mi Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 4,608cc281cu in |
| Length | 4,901mm193in | 4,975mm196in |
| Width | 1,935mm76in | 1,980mm78in |
| Height | 1,632mm64in | 1,955mm77in |
| Wheelbase | 2,928mm115in | 2,850mm112in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,650mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,652mm65in | 1,645mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 172mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 660L | 259L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,725L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | - | 93L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 327g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 8.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph Limited | 195 km/h 121 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 134 km/h 83 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 313 hp 233 kW |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 309 hp 230 kW |
AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh has 4 hp more than Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 and AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 439 Nm 324 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 2,815 kg 6,206 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 195 km/h 121 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 6.8 s |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 1.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 313 hp 233 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph |
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | 309 hp 230 kW | 8.6 s | 195 km/h 121 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp 233 kW | 309 hp 230 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 439 Nm 324 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph | 195 km/h 121 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb | 2,815 kg 6,206 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 669 km 416 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 327 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | 259 L 9.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 101 Nm more
- Is 445 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 401 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























