Car comparison

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015 4.6 V8vsVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) · Facelift 2015

4.6 V8

309 hp4608 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2021

Volkswagen Teramont

3.6 FSI V6

280 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6

Lightest
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
Best power-to-weight
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Lowest city consumption
14.4 L/100 km
16.3 mpg US
19.6 mpg UK
Lowest highway consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Lowest CO2 emissions
247 g/km
Best overall score
60/100
Best economy score
78/100
Best practicality score
91/100

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.6 s
Fastest top speed
195 km/h
121 mph
Most powerful
309 hp
230 kW
Highest torque
439 Nm
324 lb-ft
Best estimated range
669 km
416 mi
Best performance score
47/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power	309hp230kW	280hp209kW
Torque	439Nm324lb-ft	360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight	2,815kg6,206lb	2,105kg4,641lb
Gross weight	3,350kg7,385lb	2,700kg5,952lb
Top speed	195 km/h 121 mph	190 km/h 118 mph
To 99% top speed	98.9s99% target: 193 km/h / 120 mph Calculated	81.7s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.6s	8.9s
0-60 mph	8.0s Calculated	8.4s Calculated
Fuel consumption	13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK	10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city	18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK	14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway	11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK	8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.2s Calculated	16.5s Calculated
Power-to-weight	110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated	133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	156Nm/t104lb-ft/ton Calculated	171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	669km416mi Calculated	660km410mi Calculated
Displacement	4,608cc281cu in	3,597cc220cu in
Length	4,975mm196in	5,036mm198in
Width	1,980mm78in	1,989mm78in
Height	1,955mm77in	1,769mm70in
Wheelbase	2,850mm112in	2,979mm117in
Front track	1,650mm65in	-
Rear track	1,645mm65in	-
Ground clearance	-	203mm8in
Trunk volume	259L	-
Doors	5	5
Seats	7	5
Fuel tank	93L	70L
CO2 emissions	327g/km	247g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6PowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	5,500 rpm	3,400 rpm	5,750 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	6,200 rpm	3,500 rpm	6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.0 s	8.4 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.6 s	8.9 s
Top speed	195 km/h 121 mph	190 km/h 118 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.4 s	2.6 s
330 ft 101 m	6.7 s	7.0 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.3 s	10.6 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.5 s	13.8 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.2 s	16.5 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	134 km/h 83 mph	135 km/h 84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	309 hp 230 kW
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	280 hp 209 kW

Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 has 29 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 29 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	439 Nm 324 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	360 Nm 266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	2,815 kg 6,206 lb
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	2,105 kg 4,641 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	195 km/h 121 mph
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	190 km/h 118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	8.6 s
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8 and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 and Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8: 3.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	669 km 416 mi
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	660 km 410 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	309 hp 230 kW	8.6 s	195 km/h 121 mph
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	280 hp 209 kW	8.9 s	190 km/h 118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

Power	309 hp 230 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 195 km/h 121 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	259 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,975 mm 195.9 in
Height	1,955 mm 77.0 in

VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6

Power	280 hp 209 kW
0-100 km/h	8.9 s
Top speed 190 km/h 118 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,036 mm 198.3 in
Height	1,769 mm 69.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

Power	309 hp 230 kW
0-100 km/h	8.6 s
Top speed 195 km/h 121 mph

13.9 L/100 km

16.9 mpg US

20.3 mpg UK

VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6

Power	280 hp 209 kW
0-100 km/h	8.9 s
Top speed 190 km/h 118 mph

10.6 L/100 km

22.2 mpg US

26.6 mpg UK

Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK	8.6 s
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK	8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8	110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp	13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6	133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp	10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

ToyotaLand Cruiser (J200)Facelift 20154.6 V8

VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6

Power

309 hp

230 kW

280 hp

209 kW

Torque

439 Nm

324 lb-ft

360 Nm

266 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.6 s

8.9 s

Top speed

195 km/h

121 mph

190 km/h

118 mph

Lightness

2,815 kg

6,206 lb

2,105 kg

4,641 lb

Fuel consumption

13.9 L/100 km

16.9 mpg US

20.3 mpg UK

10.6 L/100 km

22.2 mpg US

26.6 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 7 seats
Trunk	259 L 9.1 cu ft
Length	4,975 mm 195.9 in
Height	1,955 mm 77.0 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	-
Length	5,036 mm 198.3 in
Height	1,769 mm 69.6 in

Range score

669 km

416 mi

660 km

410 mi

CO2 score

327 g/km

247 g/km

Trunk score

259 L

9.1 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

110 hp/t

82 kW/t

9.1 kg/hp

133 hp/t

99 kW/t

7.5 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Toyota Land Cruiser (J200) Facelift 2015 4.6 V8	Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
Consumption	13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK	10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	24.33 LC100 km	18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	39.15 LC100 mi	29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal	1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	3,649 LC/year	2,783 LC/year