Volkswagen Teramont Pro
Car comparison
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont
3.6 FSI V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range838 km521 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score84/100
Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Lightest2,105 kg4,641 lb
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Gross weight | 2,715kg5,986lb | 2,700kg5,952lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 81.7s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.1s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28.2mpg US33.8mpg UK | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 838km521mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 3,597cc220cu in |
| Length | 5,158mm203in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,991mm78in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,788mm70in | 1,769mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,979mm117in |
| Front track | 1,704mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,719mm68in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 203mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 286L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,427L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 247g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 6,200 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.1 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 has 8 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 8.9 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 has more power, Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 838 km 521 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 280 hp 209 kW | 8.9 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 |
| 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | 2,105 kg 4,641 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 838 km 521 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 247 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI | Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.61 LC100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.52 LC100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,253 L331 US gal276 UK gal | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,192 LC/year | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 178 km (111 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
- Has 8 hp more
- Is 50 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























