Volkswagen Teramont Pro
Car comparison
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range838 km521 mi
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score84/100
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Lightest2,060 kg4,542 lb
- Best practicality score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,155kg4,751lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Gross weight | 2,715kg5,986lb | 2,670kg5,886lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 82.8s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.1s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28.2mpg US33.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 170Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 838km521mi Calculated | 745km463mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 5,158mm203in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,991mm78in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,788mm70in | 1,769mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,980mm117in | 2,979mm117in |
| Front track | 1,704mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,719mm68in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 203mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 286L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,427L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 221g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 4,400-6,200 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.1 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 135 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI has 52 hp more than Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: 52 hp (39 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI and Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 838 km 521 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 745 km 463 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.6 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | VolkswagenTeramont2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | 2,060 kg 4,542 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 838 km 521 mi | 745 km 463 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 221 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI | Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.61 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.52 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,253 L331 US gal276 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,192 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Has 52 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 94 km (58 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Teramont 2.0 TSI
- Is 95 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























