Volkswagen Tayron II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Teramont Pro
450TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,734 kg3,823 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk345 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range838 km521 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,734kg3,823lb | 2,155kg4,751lb |
| Gross weight | 2,310kg5,093lb | 2,715kg5,986lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 83.0s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.1s Calculated | 50.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28.2mpg US33.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 231Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | 838km521mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 5,158mm203in |
| Width | 1,866mm73in | 1,991mm78in |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,788mm70in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,980mm117in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,704mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,719mm68in |
| Trunk volume | 345L | 286L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,090L | 2,427L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.1 s | 50.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI has 7 hp more than Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 6.1 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 7.6 s |
Although Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI has more power, Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 674 km 419 mi |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 838 km 521 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.6 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 250 km/h155 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,734 kg 3,823 lb | 2,155 kg 4,751 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.2 mpg US 33.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | 838 km 521 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 345 L 12.2 cu ft | 286 L 10.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 14.61 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 23.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,253 L331 US gal276 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,192 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron II 2.0 TSI
- Is 421 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 km/h (25 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 59 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 164 km (102 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























