Car comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 BiTDI

240 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboSUV2019-2020
VS

Volkswagen Teramont

3.6 FSI V6

280 hp3597 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,725 kg
    3,803 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    161 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    968 km
    601 mi
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power
240hp179kW
280hp209kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,725kg3,803lb
2,105kg4,641lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
2,700kg5,952lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
190 km/h
118 mph
To 99% top speed
73.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
81.7s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
25.3s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton
Calculated
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
968km601mi
Calculated
660km410mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
3,597cc220cu in
Length
4,486mm177in
5,036mm198in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,989mm78in
Height
1,673mm66in
1,769mm70in
Wheelbase
2,677mm105in
2,979mm117in
Front track
1,586mm62in
-
Rear track
1,576mm62in
-
Ground clearance
200mm8in
203mm8in
Trunk volume
615L
-
Max trunk volume
1,655L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
70L
CO2 emissions
161g/km
247g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V66,200 rpm3,500 rpm6,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.3 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
190 km/h
118 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
135 km/h
84 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
280 hp
209 kW

Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 has 40 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
360 Nm
266 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
2,105 kg
4,641 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
190 km/h
118 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI6.5 s
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V68.9 s

Although Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 has more power, Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 2.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6: 4.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
968 km
601 mi
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
660 km
410 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
240 hp
179 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
280 hp
209 kW
8.9 s
190 km/h
118 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
190 km/h
118 mph
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
Power
240 hp
179 kW
280 hp
209 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
8.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
190 km/h
118 mph
Lightness
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
2,105 kg
4,641 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
10.6 L/100 km
22.2 mpg US
26.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,036 mm
198.3 in
Height
1,769 mm
69.6 in
Range score
968 km
601 mi
660 km
410 mi
CO2 score
161 g/km
247 g/km
Trunk score
615 L
21.7 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDIVolkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km18.55 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi29.85 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year2,783 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI

  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Is 380 kg lighter
  • Is 2.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 307 km (191 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 86 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power

Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6

  • Has 40 hp more

Pros

  • Most powerful

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
530 V6
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021530 V6
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
450TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
530 TSI V6
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTalagon530 TSI V6
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)3.0 V6 TDI
3.6 FSI V6
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTouareg II (7P)Facelift 20143.0 V6 TDI
2.0 BiTDI
380TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenTayron I380TSI
3.6 FSI V6
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI
2.0 BiTDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDIvsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI vs Volkswagen Teramont 3.6 FSI V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster