Volkswagen Tiguan III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSIvsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 BiTDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,678 kg3,699 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk652 L
- Best overall score70/100
- Best performance score61/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range968 km601 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,678kg3,699lb | 1,725kg3,803lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.0s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.2s Calculated | 25.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 682km424mi Calculated | 968km601mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,539mm179in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,859mm73in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,656mm65in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,578mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 652L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,650L | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 161g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.2 s | 25.3 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 160 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI has 25 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 5.9 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI and Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 682 km 424 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 968 km 601 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.9 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 BiTDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,678 kg 3,699 lb | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 682 km 424 mi | 968 km 601 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 161 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 652 L 23.0 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan III 2.0 TSI
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 47 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 37 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 BiTDI
- Has 100 Nm more
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 285 km (177 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























