Toyota RAV4 V
Car comparison
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Lightest1,685 kg3,715 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk580 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 243Nm179lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,685kg3,715lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.0s Calculated | 66.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 764km475mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,487cc152cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,600mm181in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,855mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,690mm67in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,630mm64in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 580L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 6,600 rpm | 4,000-5,000 rpm | 6,850 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.0 s | 66.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has 3 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
Although Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 764 km 475 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | ToyotaRAV4 V2.5 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 243 Nm 179 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,685 kg 3,715 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 764 km 475 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 580 L 20.5 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
- Has 3 hp more
- Is 265 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Has 177 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 440 km (273 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























