Car comparison

Toyota RAV4 V 2.5vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Toyota RAV4 V

2.5

200 hp2487 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSUV2019-2021
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D4

190 hp1969 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    135 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,078 km
    670 mi
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Toyota RAV4 V 2.5

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,685 kg
    3,715 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    119 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    580 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelToyotaRAV4 V2.5VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
200hp149kW
190hp142kW
Torque
243Nm179lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,685kg3,715lb
1,947kg4,292lb
Gross weight
2,125kg4,685lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
86.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
88.0s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
53.0s
Calculated
67.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
144Nm/t96lb-ft/ton
Calculated
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
764km475mi
Calculated
1,078km670mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,487cc152cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,600mm181in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,855mm73in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,690mm67in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,600mm63in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,630mm64in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance
200mm8in
216mm9in
Trunk volume
580L
505L
Max trunk volume-
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
55L
CO2 emissions
163g/km
135g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Toyota RAV4 V 2.5Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4PowerTorque
  • Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
ToyotaRAV4 V2.56,600 rpm4,000-5,000 rpm6,850 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D44,250 rpm1,740-2,520 rpm5,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricToyotaRAV4 V2.5VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
53.0 s
67.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
200 hp
149 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW

Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has 10 hp more than Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4.

The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
243 Nm
179 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,947 kg
4,292 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaRAV4 V2.58.5 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D48.4 s

Although Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 has more power, Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 and Toyota RAV4 V 2.5: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
764 km
475 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
1,078 km
670 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
200 hp
149 kW
8.5 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
190 hp
142 kW
8.4 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Length
4,600 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,690 mm
66.5 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
8.5 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
ToyotaRAV4 V2.5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleToyotaRAV4 V2.5VolvoXC60 II2.0 D4
Power
200 hp
149 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
243 Nm
179 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
1,947 kg
4,292 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
5.1 L/100 km
46.1 mpg US
55.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
580 L
20.5 cu ft
Length
4,600 mm
181.1 in
Height
1,690 mm
66.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
764 km
475 mi
1,078 km
670 mi
CO2 score
163 g/km
135 g/km
Trunk score
580 L
20.5 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
98 hp/t
73 kW/t
10.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleToyota RAV4 V 2.5Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km8.92 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi14.36 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal765 L202 US gal168 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year1,339 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Toyota RAV4 V 2.5

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 262 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 75 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4

  • Has 157 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 315 km (195 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 28 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Toyota RAV4 V 2.5
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Toyota RAV4 V 2.5 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster