Volvo XC40
Car comparison
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Most powerful197 hp147 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Lightest1,706 kg3,761 lb
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,706kg3,761lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Gross weight | 2,220kg4,894lb | - |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 90.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 54.9s Calculated | 66.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,425mm174in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,702mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,626mm64in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 161g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 54.9 s | 66.5 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 has 7 hp more than Volvo XC40 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 783 km 486 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,706 kg 3,761 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 161 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Is 244 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 421 km (261 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























