Volkswagen Tayron I
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSIvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.3 s
- Most powerful197 hp147 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted210 km/h130 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,735 kg3,825 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk506 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 186hp139kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.6s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.5s Calculated | 66.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 863km536mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,595mm181in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,660mm65in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,731mm108in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 506L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.5 s | 66.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 has 11 hp more than Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 8.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 and Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 863 km 536 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 186 hp 139 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron I330TSI | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 186 hp 139 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 863 km 536 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron I 330TSI
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 340 km (211 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























