Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight109 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Most powerful197 hp147 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 420Nm310lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 86.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.8s Calculated | 66.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 951km591mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | - | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | - | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | - | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,760 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.8 s | 66.5 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 has 7 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 8.3 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 951 km 591 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.3 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 951 km 591 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B4
- Has 7 hp more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 253 km (157 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























