Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Volvo XC40

2.0 T4

190 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,510 kg
    3,329 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    122 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,109 km
    689 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,510kg3,329lb
1,706kg3,761lb
Gross weight
2,105kg4,641lb
2,220kg4,894lb
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
90.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
38.3s
Calculated
54.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
111hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,109km689mi
Calculated
783km486mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,425mm174in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,863mm73in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,702mm106in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,601mm63in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,626mm64in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
-
Trunk volume
450L
460L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
54L
CO2 emissions
122g/km
161g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Volvo XC40 2.0 T4PowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoXC402.0 T44,700 rpm1,400-4,000 rpm4,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0VolvoXC402.0 T4
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.3 s
54.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
VolvoXC402.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
VolvoXC402.0 T4
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
VolvoXC402.0 T4
1,706 kg
3,761 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoXC402.0 T4
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.07.9 s
VolvoXC402.0 T48.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T4
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
VolvoXC402.0 T4
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,109 km
689 mi
VolvoXC402.0 T4
783 km
486 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
220 km/h
137 mph
VolvoXC402.0 T4
190 hp
142 kW
8.5 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
7.9 s
VolvoXC402.0 T4
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
VolvoXC402.0 T4
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0VolvoXC402.0 T4
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.5 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,510 kg
3,329 lb
1,706 kg
3,761 lb
Fuel consumption
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Length
4,425 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
1,109 km
689 mi
783 km
486 mi
CO2 score
122 g/km
161 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
460 L
16.2 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
111 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
Consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.05 LC100 km12.08 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.96 LC100 mi19.43 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used690 L182 US gal152 UK gal1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,208 LC/year1,811 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 196 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 326 km (203 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 39 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Volvo XC40 2.0 T4

  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 T4
2.0 T4
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T4vsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T4
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0 T4
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T4vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
Cooper SD 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T4vsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 T4
2.0 TDI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T4vsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
40 TDI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 T4
40 TDI
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T4vsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
2.0 T4
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
VolvoXC402.0 T4vsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 - car comparison - FastVsFaster