AUDI Q3 II (F3)
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDIvsMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (F60)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight126 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions122 g/km
- Best economy score94/100
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
- Fastest top speed221 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,125 km699 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,695kg3,737lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.2s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated | 80.8s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.0s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,125km699mi Calculated | 1,109km689mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,484mm177in | 4,299mm169in |
| Width | 1,856mm73in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,557mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,563mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 165mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 530L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,525L | 1,390L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 51L |
| CO2 emissions | 148g/km | 122g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.0 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 8.0 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 1,125 km 699 mi |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,109 km 689 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 221 km/h 137 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,125 km 699 mi | 1,109 km 689 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 148 g/km | 122 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 8.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,208 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 26 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























