Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Ford Puma

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hpGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Highest torque
    248 Nm
    183 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Lightest
    1,205 kg
    2,657 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    933 km
    580 mi
  • Largest trunk
    468 L
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170hp127kW
155hp116kW
Torque
248Nm183lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,315kg2,899lb
1,205kg2,657lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,765kg3,891lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
82.4s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
45.0s
Calculated
51.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.1L/100 km57.4mpg US68.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
646km402mi
Calculated
933km580mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
-
Length
4,226mm166in
4,207mm166in
Width-
1,805mm71in
Height
1,533mm60in
1,538mm61in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,567mm62in
-
Rear track
1,523mm60in
-
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
468L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,161L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
42L
CO2 emissions-
101g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
45.0 s
51.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
141 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost has 15 hp more than Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1,205 kg
2,657 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
210 km/h
130 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost9.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
933 km
580 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
9.0 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
1,205 kg
2,657 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
4.5 L/100 km
52.3 mpg US
62.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,207 mm
165.6 in
Height
1,538 mm
60.6 in
Range score
646 km
402 mi
933 km
580 mi
CO2 score
-
101 g/km
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
468 L
16.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostFord Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km7.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi12.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal675 L178 US gal148 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,181 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 8 Nm more
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 110 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 287 km (178 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 12 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
35 TFSI
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
Cooper D 2.0
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 220
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
1.0 EcoBoost
1.2 PureTech
VS
FordPuma1.0 EcoBoostvsPeugeot2008 II1.2 PureTech
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost vs Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster