Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupra Terramar 1.5 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Cupra Terramar

1.5 TSI

177 hp1498 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Most powerful
    177 hp
    132 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    0.5 L/100 km
    470.4 mpg US
    565.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    9,000 km
    5,592 mi
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,315 kg
    2,899 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Power
170hp127kW
177hp132kW
Torque
248Nm183lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,315kg2,899lb
1,829kg4,032lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
2,420kg5,335lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
72.5s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
34.8s
Calculated
40.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
646km402mi
Calculated
9,000km5,592mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,519mm178in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,869mm74in
Height
1,533mm60in
1,586mm62in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,681mm106in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
45L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostCupra Terramar 1.5 TSIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI5,500-6,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
34.8 s
40.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
177 hp
132 kW

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI has 7 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1,829 kg
4,032 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI7.3 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 6.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
9,000 km
5,592 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
177 hp
132 kW
7.3 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
CupraTerramar1.5 TSI
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
177 hp
132 kW
Torque
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
1,829 kg
4,032 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,519 mm
177.9 in
Height
1,586 mm
62.4 in
Range score
646 km
402 mi
9,000 km
5,592 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostCupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km0.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi1.41 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal75 L20 US gal16 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year131.25 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 514 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 2 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8,354 km (5,191 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsCupraAtecaFacelift 20202.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsCupraFormentor2.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1.5 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20242.0 TDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 220
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLA 250e
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e
1.5 TSI
40 TDI
VS
CupraTerramar1.5 TSIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost vs Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster