Volkswagen Tiguan III
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma · Facelift 2024
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.4 L/100 km588.0 mpg US706.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range11,250 km6,990 mi
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 248Nm183lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,315kg2,899lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.3s Calculated | 45.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 0.4L/100 km588mpg US706.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 138Nm/t92lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 11,250km6,990mi Calculated | 646km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,539mm179in | 4,226mm166in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | - |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,533mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,679mm105in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,583mm62in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,486L | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 42L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | - | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 5,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.3 s | 45.0 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 170 hp 127 kW |
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI has 7 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 248 Nm 183 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 7.0 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 6.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 11,250 km 6,990 mi |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 646 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.0 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI |
| 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 248 Nm 183 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,815 kg 4,001 lb | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 0.4 L/100 km 588.0 mpg US 706.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 11,250 km 6,990 mi | 646 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 0.4 L/100 km588 mpg US706.2 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 0.70 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 1.13 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 60 L16 US gal13 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 105.00 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan III 1.5 TSI
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 2 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 6.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 10,604 km (6,589 mi) more estimated range
- Has 34 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
- Is 500 kg lighter
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























