Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsHyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Hyundai Kona II

1.6 T-GDI

170 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Lightest
    1,315 kg
    2,899 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI

  • Highest torque
    265 Nm
    195 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    723 km
    449 mi
  • Largest trunk
    466 L
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Power
170hp127kW
170hp127kW
Torque
248Nm183lb-ft
265Nm195lb-ft
Curb weight
1,315kg2,899lb
1,490kg3,285lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,915kg4,222lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
82.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
45.0s
Calculated
54.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
646km402mi
Calculated
723km449mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,226mm166in
4,350mm171in
Width-
1,825mm72in
Height
1,533mm60in
1,585mm62in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,591mm63in
Rear track
1,523mm60in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
152mm6in
170mm7in
Trunk volume
456L
466L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,300L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
47L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostHyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,600-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
45.0 s
54.9 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
170 hp
127 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
265 Nm
195 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
210 km/h
130 mph
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
208 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
723 km
449 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
208 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.5 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Range score
646 km
402 mi
723 km
449 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostHyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI

  • Has 17 Nm more
  • Has 77 km (48 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 VGT
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
1.3 Turbo
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 VGT
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 220
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
1.6 T-GDI
GLA 200
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost vs Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster