Alfa Romeo Tonale
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGTvsHyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Kona II
1.6 T-GDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range846 km526 mi
- Largest trunk500 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,525kg3,362lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 1,915kg4,222lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.0s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 82.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 51.2s Calculated | 54.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.3s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 157Nm/t105lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 846km526mi Calculated | 723km449mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,469cc90cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,528mm178in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,601mm63in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 156mm6in | 170mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 466L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 47L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 5,750 rpm | 1,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.3 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 51.2 s | 54.9 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 160 hp 119 kW |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 8.8 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 846 km 526 mi |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 723 km 449 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.8 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,525 kg 3,362 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 846 km 526 mi | 723 km 449 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT | Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Tonale 1.5 VGT
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 123 km (76 mi) more estimated range
- Has 34 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























