Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 200vsHyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHyundai Kona II
1.6 T-GDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Lightest1,490 kg3,285 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range723 km449 mi
- Largest trunk466 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 270Nm199lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 1,915kg4,222lb |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 82.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 54.4s Calculated | 54.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 589km366mi Calculated | 723km449mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,332cc81cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,350mm171in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,591mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 170mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 425L | 466L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,420L | 1,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 47L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: Power / Torque
- Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 54.4 s | 54.9 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 140 km/h 87 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 8.9 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 589 km 366 mi |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 723 km 449 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.9 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200 | HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 210 km/h 130 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 589 km 366 mi | 723 km 449 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200 | Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 200
- Has 5 Nm more
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 134 km (83 mi) more estimated range
- Has 41 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























