Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 220vsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023

GLB 220

190 hp1991 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2025
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220

  • Fastest top speed
    214 km/h
    133 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    714 km
    444 mi
  • Largest trunk
    565 L
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Lightest
    1,315 kg
    2,899 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    129 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
190hp142kW
170hp127kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
248Nm183lb-ft
Curb weight
1,690kg3,726lb
1,315kg2,899lb
Gross weight
2,265kg4,993lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
79.1s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
43.1s
Calculated
45.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
714km444mi
Calculated
646km402mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,634mm182in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,834mm72in
-
Height
1,697mm67in
1,533mm60in
Wheelbase
2,829mm111in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,604mm63in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance
135mm5in
152mm6in
Trunk volume
565L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,800L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 2205,500-6,100 rpm1,800-4,000 rpm6,350 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.1 s
45.0 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.3 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 has 20 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
1,690 kg
3,726 lb
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
214 km/h
133 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
190 hp
142 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
7.4 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,690 kg
3,726 lb
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Range score
714 km
444 mi
646 km
402 mi
Trunk score
565 L
20.0 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
84 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 52 Nm more
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 109 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 375 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 220
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 220 vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster