Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 220dvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma · Facelift 2024
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range923 km574 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,315 kg2,899 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 248Nm183lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,715kg3,781lb | 1,315kg2,899lb |
| Gross weight | 2,290kg5,049lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.4s Calculated | 45.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 923km574mi Calculated | 646km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,226mm166in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,533mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 152mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,805L | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 42L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 5,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.4 s | 45.0 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d has 20 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 248 Nm 183 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 7.8 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 7.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 923 km 574 mi |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 646 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d | FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 248 Nm 183 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | 1,315 kg 2,899 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 923 km 574 mi | 646 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 152 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 277 km (172 mi) more estimated range
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
- Is 400 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























