Car comparison

Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Tayron II

1.5 TSI

177 hp1498 ccHybridFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

ST 1.0 EcoBoost

170 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    215 km/h
    134 mph
  • Most powerful
    177 hp
    132 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    0.5 L/100 km
    470.4 mpg US
    565.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    9,000 km
    5,592 mi
  • Largest trunk
    705 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    100/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
177hp132kW
170hp127kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
248Nm183lb-ft
Curb weight
1,873kg4,129lb
1,315kg2,899lb
Gross weight
2,500kg5,512lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
77.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.3s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
40.5s
Calculated
45.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.9s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
95hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb
Calculated
129hp/t96kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton
Calculated
189Nm/t126lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
9,000km5,592mi
Calculated
646km402mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,792mm189in
4,226mm166in
Width
1,866mm73in
-
Height
1,666mm66in
1,533mm60in
Wheelbase
2,789mm110in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,579mm62in
1,523mm60in
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume
705L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,915L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
45L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSIFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI5,000 rpm1,500-4,000 rpm5,250 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost5,750 rpm3,000 rpm6,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.9 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.3 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.5 s
45.0 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.9 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.8 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
177 hp
132 kW
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW

Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI has 7 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
248 Nm
183 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1,873 kg
4,129 lb
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1,315 kg
2,899 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
215 km/h
134 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI7.3 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost7.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost: 6.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
95 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.6 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
9,000 km
5,592 mi
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
646 km
402 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
177 hp
132 kW
7.3 s
215 km/h
134 mph
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
170 hp
127 kW
7.4 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
705 L
24.9 cu ft
Length
4,792 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
7.3 s
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
95 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.6 kg/hp
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Power
177 hp
132 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
248 Nm
183 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.3 s
7.4 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,873 kg
4,129 lb
1,315 kg
2,899 lb
Fuel consumption
0.5 L/100 km
470.4 mpg US
565.0 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
705 L
24.9 cu ft
Length
4,792 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,666 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,226 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,533 mm
60.4 in
Range score
9,000 km
5,592 mi
646 km
402 mi
Trunk score
705 L
24.9 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
95 hp/t
70 kW/t
10.6 kg/hp
129 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSIFord Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km0.88 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi1.41 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used75 L20 US gal16 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost131.25 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 2 Nm more
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 6.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8,354 km (5,191 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 249 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 558 kg lighter
  • Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI
Ford Puma ST 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 TSI
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron X330TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupraTerramar1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.5 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20222.0 TSI
1.5 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 220
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220
1.5 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
GLA 250e
VS
FordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 250e
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 ST 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster