Car comparison

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Hyundai Kona II

1.6 T-GDI

170 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2024-2025
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    208 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Highest torque
    265 Nm
    195 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    723 km
    449 mi
  • Largest trunk
    466 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best practicality score
    82/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Lightest
    1,293 kg
    2,851 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
170hp127kW
155hp116kW
Torque
265Nm195lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,490kg3,285lb
1,293kg2,851lb
Gross weight
1,915kg4,222lb
1,835kg4,045lb
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
82.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
54.9s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
723km449mi
Calculated
667km414mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,350mm171in
4,186mm165in
Width
1,825mm72in
-
Height
1,585mm62in
1,550mm61in
Wheelbase
2,660mm105in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,591mm63in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,526mm60in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
163mm6in
Trunk volume
466L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,300L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
47L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,600-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
54.9 s
-
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
170 hp
127 kW
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI has 15 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
208 km/h
129 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI8.5 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
723 km
449 mi
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
208 km/h
129 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
8.5 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleHyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
170 hp
127 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
265 Nm
195 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.7 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,490 kg
3,285 lb
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
466 L
16.5 cu ft
Length
4,350 mm
171.3 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Range score
723 km
449 mi
667 km
414 mi
Trunk score
466 L
16.5 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleHyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDIFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 56 km (35 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 197 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 T-GDI
2.2 CRDi
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsHyundaiSanta Fe IV (TM)Facelift 20202.2 CRDi
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 VGT
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1.6 T-GDI
ST 1.0 EcoBoost
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsFordPumaFacelift 2024ST 1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
1.6 T-GDI
1.5 VGT
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
1.6 T-GDI
GLA 200
VS
HyundaiKona II1.6 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 TCe
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe
1.0 EcoBoost
D 2.0
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMiniCountryman (U25)D 2.0
Hyundai Kona II 1.6 T-GDI vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster