Ford Puma · Facelift 2024
Car comparison
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsRenault Duster II · Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRenault Duster II · Facelift 2024
1.3 TCe
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,293 kg2,851 lb
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score90/100
Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe
- Most powerful162 hp121 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Largest trunk475 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 155hp116kW | 162hp121kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,293kg2,851lb | 1,341kg2,956lb |
| Gross weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,853kg4,085lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 75.8s99% target: 188 km/h / 117 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.7s | 9.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.6s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 8.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 999cc61cu in | 1,332cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,186mm165in | 4,376mm172in |
| Width | 1,805mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,550mm61in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,588mm102in | 2,673mm105in |
| Front track | 1,567mm62in | 1,557mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,526mm60in | 1,560mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 163mm6in | 237mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 456L | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,216L | 1,478L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 42L | 46L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
- Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 8.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.7 s | 9.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.6 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 190 km/h 118 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 136 km/h 84 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 162 hp 121 kW |
Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe has 7 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 1,341 kg 2,956 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 190 km/h 118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 9.2 s |
Although Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | 162 hp 121 kW | 9.2 s | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | RenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 155 hp 116 kW | 162 hp 121 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.7 s | 9.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb | 1,341 kg 2,956 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Is 48 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Renault Duster II Facelift 2024 1.3 TCe
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 19 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























