Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsCupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 1.5 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,293 kg
    2,851 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    456 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
Power
155hp116kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,293kg2,851lb
1,359kg2,996lb
Gross weight
1,835kg4,045lb
1,960kg4,321lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
205 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
82.2s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
50.6s
Calculated
64.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
667km414mi
Calculated
769km478mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,186mm165in
4,451mm175in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,550mm61in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,679mm105in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,583mm62in
Rear track
1,526mm60in
1,555mm61in
Ground clearance
163mm6in
-
Trunk volume
456L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
50L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostCupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 TSIPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.6 s
64.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
205 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
1,359 kg
2,996 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
205 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 TSI: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
769 km
478 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,451 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
CupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
Power
155 hp
116 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
205 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
1,359 kg
2,996 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,451 mm
175.2 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Range score
667 km
414 mi
769 km
478 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
110 hp/t
82 kW/t
9.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostCupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 TSI
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km11.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi18.31 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal975 L258 US gal214 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year1,706 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 66 kg lighter
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 6 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cupra Formentor Facelift 2024 1.5 TSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Cupra Formentor 1.5 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost vs Cupra Formentor · Facelift 2024 1.5 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster