Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsNissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) · Facelift 2024

1.3 DIG-T

158 hp1332 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Quickest 0-100 km/h
8.7 s
Fastest top speed
210 km/h
130 mph Unrestricted
200 km/h
124 mph Restricted
Lightest
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Best power-to-weight
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Lowest combined fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Best overall score
55/100
Best performance score
43/100
Best economy score
90/100

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T

Most powerful
158 hp
118 kW
Highest torque
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Best estimated range
859 km
534 mi
Largest trunk
504 L
Best practicality score
84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
Model	FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
Power	155hp116kW	158hp118kW
Torque	240Nm177lb-ft	270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight	1,293kg2,851lb	1,510kg3,329lb
Gross weight	1,835kg4,045lb	1,985kg4,376lb
Top speed	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated	199 km/h 124 mph
To 99% top speed	80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated	86.3s99% target: 197 km/h / 122 mph Calculated
0-100 km/h	8.7s	9.2s
0-200 km/h	50.6s Calculated	-
0-60 mph	8.2s Calculated	8.7s Calculated
Fuel consumption	6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK	6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Quarter mile	16.3s Calculated	16.7s Calculated
Power-to-weight	120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated	105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated
Torque-to-weight	186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated	179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated
Estimated range	667km414mi Calculated	859km534mi Calculated
Displacement	999cc61cu in	1,332cc81cu in
Length	4,186mm165in	4,425mm174in
Width	1,805mm71in	1,835mm72in
Height	1,550mm61in	1,625mm64in
Wheelbase	2,588mm102in	2,665mm105in
Front track	1,567mm62in	1,590mm63in
Rear track	1,526mm60in	1,596mm63in
Ground clearance	163mm6in	-
Trunk volume	456L	504L
Max trunk volume	1,216L	1,447L
Doors	5	5
Seats	5	5
Fuel tank	42L	55L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostNissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-TPowerTorque

Dyno simulation data table
Vehicle	Peak power RPM	Peak torque RPM	Max engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6,000 rpm	2,500 rpm	6,250 rpm
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	5,500 rpm	1,800-3,750 rpm	5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
Metric	FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
	Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h	8.2 s	8.7 s
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph	8.7 s	9.2 s
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph	50.6 s	-
Top speed	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited	199 km/h 124 mph
	Drag race simulation
60 ft 18 m	2.7 s	2.7 s
330 ft 101 m	7.1 s	7.2 s
1/8 mile 201 m	10.7 s	10.8 s
1000 ft 305 m	13.8 s	14.0 s
1/4 mile 402 m	16.3 s	16.7 s
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m	142 km/h 88 mph	136 km/h 85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	155 hp 116 kW
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	158 hp 118 kW

Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T has 3 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	240 Nm 177 lb-ft
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	270 Nm 199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	1,293 kg 2,851 lb
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	1,510 kg 3,329 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	199 km/h 124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	8.7 s
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	9.2 s

Although Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T has more power, Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
Vehicle	Value
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	667 km 414 mi
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	859 km 534 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
Vehicle	Power	Acceleration	Top speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	155 hp 116 kW	8.7 s	Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	158 hp 118 kW	9.2 s	199 km/h 124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Vehicle

Performance score

Practicality score

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power	155 hp 116 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,186 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,550 mm 61.0 in

NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T

Power	158 hp 118 kW
0-100 km/h	9.2 s
Top speed 199 km/h 124 mph

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	504 L 17.8 cu ft
Length	4,425 mm 174.2 in
Height	1,625 mm 64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Vehicle

Performance score

Fuel economy score

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

Power	155 hp 116 kW
0-100 km/h	8.7 s
Top speed Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph

6.3 L/100 km

37.3 mpg US

44.8 mpg UK

NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T

Power	158 hp 118 kW
0-100 km/h	9.2 s
Top speed 199 km/h 124 mph

6.4 L/100 km

36.8 mpg US

44.1 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Fuel consumption, L/100 km	0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK	8.7 s
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK	9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
Vehicle	Power-to-weight, hp/t	Fuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost	120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp	6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK
NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T	105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp	6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Vehicle

FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost

NissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T

Power

155 hp

116 kW

158 hp

118 kW

Torque

240 Nm

177 lb-ft

270 Nm

199 lb-ft

Acceleration

8.7 s

9.2 s

Top speed

Unrestricted

210 km/h130 mph

Restricted

200 km/h124 mph

199 km/h

124 mph

Lightness

1,293 kg

2,851 lb

1,510 kg

3,329 lb

Fuel consumption

6.3 L/100 km

37.3 mpg US

44.8 mpg UK

6.4 L/100 km

36.8 mpg US

44.1 mpg UK

Practicality

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	456 L 16.1 cu ft
Length	4,186 mm 164.8 in
Height	1,550 mm 61.0 in

Doors/seats	5 doors 5 seats
Trunk	504 L 17.8 cu ft
Length	4,425 mm 174.2 in
Height	1,625 mm 64.0 in

Range score

667 km

414 mi

859 km

534 mi

Trunk score

456 L

16.1 cu ft

504 L

17.8 cu ft

Power-to-weight score

120 hp/t

89 kW/t

8.3 kg/hp

105 hp/t

78 kW/t

9.6 kg/hp

Overall

Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Average annual distanceDistance unitFuel price in your local currencyPrice unit

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
Vehicle	Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost	Nissan Qashqai III (J12) Facelift 2024 1.3 DIG-T
Consumption	6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK	6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km	11.03 LC100 km	11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi	17.74 LC100 mi	18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used	945 L250 US gal208 UK gal	960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost	1,654 LC/year	1,680 LC/year