Car comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 1.5 TSIvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2022-2025
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,264 kg
    2,787 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    962 km
    597 mi
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
150hp112kW
155hp116kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,264kg2,787lb
1,293kg2,851lb
Gross weight
1,850kg4,079lb
1,835kg4,045lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
75.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
59.5s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
962km597mi
Calculated
667km414mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,498cc91cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,236mm167in
4,186mm165in
Width
1,819mm72in
-
Height
1,584mm62in
1,550mm61in
Wheelbase
2,590mm102in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,549mm61in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,541mm61in
1,526mm60in
Ground clearance
161mm6in
163mm6in
Trunk volume
445L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,290L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSIFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI5,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm5,250 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
59.5 s
-
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
1,264 kg
2,787 lb
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
205 km/h
127 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI8.6 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost8.7 s

Although Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has more power, Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
962 km
597 mi
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.6 s
205 km/h
127 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,584 mm
62.4 in
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
150 hp
112 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.7 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,264 kg
2,787 lb
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,236 mm
166.8 in
Height
1,584 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Range score
962 km
597 mi
667 km
414 mi
Trunk score
445 L
15.7 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSIFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Is 29 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 295 km (183 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 11 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen T-Roc I 1.5 TSI
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.5 TSI
1.5 eTSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc II1.5 eTSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 TCe
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster