Volkswagen Tayron II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSIvsVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range9,000 km5,592 mi
- Largest trunk705 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,264 kg2,787 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,873kg4,129lb | 1,264kg2,787lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 75.9s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.5s Calculated | 59.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 95hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 133Nm/t89lb-ft/ton Calculated | 198Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated | 962km597mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 4,236mm167in |
| Width | 1,866mm73in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,666mm66in | 1,584mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,789mm110in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,549mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,579mm62in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 161mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 705L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,915L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.5 s | 59.5 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI has 27 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 1,873 kg 4,129 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 1,264 kg 2,787 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI: 4.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 95 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 962 km 597 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | 95 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTayron II1.5 TSI | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 205 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,873 kg 4,129 lb | 1,264 kg 2,787 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | 962 km 597 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 705 L 24.9 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 95 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 0.88 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 131.25 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tayron II 1.5 TSI
- Has 27 hp more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8,038 km (4,995 mi) more estimated range
- Has 260 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI
- Is 609 kg lighter
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























