Car comparison

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 TurbovsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mitsubishi ASX II

1.3 Turbo

158 hp1333 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024
VS

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    204 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    158 hp
    118 kW
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    814 km
    506 mi
  • Largest trunk
    536 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMitsubishiASX II1.3 TurboFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
158hp118kW
155hp116kW
Torque
270Nm199lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,345kg2,965lb
1,293kg2,851lb
Gross weight
1,834kg4,043lb
1,835kg4,045lb
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
76.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
64.0s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
814km506mi
Calculated
667km414mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,333cc81cu in
999cc61cu in
Length
4,227mm166in
4,186mm165in
Width
1,797mm71in
-
Height
1,585mm62in
1,550mm61in
Wheelbase
2,639mm104in
2,588mm102in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,567mm62in
Rear track
1,547mm61in
1,526mm60in
Ground clearance
174mm7in
163mm6in
Trunk volume
536L
456L
Max trunk volume
1,275L
1,216L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
48L
42L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 TurboFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo5,500 rpm1,800-3,750 rpm5,750 rpm
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMitsubishiASX II1.3 TurboFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
64.0 s
-
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo has 3 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1,345 kg
2,965 lb
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
204 km/h
127 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo8.5 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
814 km
506 mi
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW
8.5 s
204 km/h
127 mph
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.5 s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMitsubishiASX II1.3 TurboFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
158 hp
118 kW
155 hp
116 kW
Torque
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.7 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,345 kg
2,965 lb
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Range score
814 km
506 mi
667 km
414 mi
Trunk score
536 L
18.9 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 TurboFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 147 km (91 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 52 kg lighter
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
1.5 VGT
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
1.3 Turbo
35 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1.3 Turbo
C 1.5
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 TCe
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe
1.3 Turbo
GLA 200
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 200d
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsSeatAronaFacelift 20211.5 TSI
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo vs Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster