Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Mitsubishi ASX II

1.3 Turbo

158 hp1333 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Most powerful
    158 hp
    118 kW
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    814 km
    506 mi
  • Largest trunk
    536 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,293 kg
    2,851 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    43/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
155hp116kW
158hp118kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
270Nm199lb-ft
Curb weight
1,293kg2,851lb
1,345kg2,965lb
Gross weight
1,835kg4,045lb
1,834kg4,043lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
76.5s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
50.6s
Calculated
63.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
667km414mi
Calculated
814km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,333cc81cu in
Length
4,186mm165in
4,227mm166in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,797mm71in
Height
1,550mm61in
1,585mm62in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,639mm104in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,526mm60in
1,547mm61in
Ground clearance
163mm6in
174mm7in
Trunk volume
456L
536L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,275L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
48L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 TurboPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo5,500 rpm1,800-3,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.6 s
63.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo has 3 hp more than Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: 3 hp (2 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
270 Nm
199 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
1,345 kg
2,965 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost8.7 s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
814 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
158 hp
118 kW
8.5 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
158 hp
118 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo
Power
155 hp
116 kW
158 hp
118 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
8.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
1,345 kg
2,965 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Length
4,227 mm
166.4 in
Height
1,585 mm
62.4 in
Range score
667 km
414 mi
814 km
506 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
536 L
18.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
117 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 52 kg lighter
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo

  • Has 3 hp more
  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 147 km (91 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.0 EcoBoost
1.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsFordPuma1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsCupraFormentorFacelift 20241.5 TSI
1.3 Turbo
1.5 VGT
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 DIG-T
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsNissanQashqai III (J12)Facelift 20241.3 DIG-T
1.3 Turbo
1.5 TSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsVolkswagenT-CrossFacelift 20231.5 TSI
1.3 Turbo
35 TFSI
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
1.0 EcoBoost
1.3 TCe
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsRenaultDuster IIFacelift 20241.3 TCe
1.3 Turbo
C 1.5
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1.0 EcoBoost
GLB 200d
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
1.3 Turbo
GLA 200
VS
MitsubishiASX II1.3 TurbovsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 200
1.0 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
VS
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTiguan III1.4 TSI
Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost vs Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo - car comparison - FastVsFaster