Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022
Car comparison
Volkswagen T-Roc I · Facelift 2022 1.5 TSIvsMitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi ASX II
1.3 Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Most powerful158 hp118 kW
- Highest torque270 Nm199 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk536 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Lightest1,278 kg2,818 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Best performance score43/100
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 158hp118kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 270Nm199lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,278kg2,818lb | 1,345kg2,965lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,834kg4,043lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.1s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 76.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 59.7s Calculated | 64.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 16.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 926km575mi Calculated | 814km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,333cc81cu in |
| Length | 4,236mm167in | 4,227mm166in |
| Width | 1,819mm72in | 1,797mm71in |
| Height | 1,584mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,590mm102in | 2,639mm104in |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,541mm61in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 161mm6in | 174mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 445L | 536L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | 1,275L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 59.7 s | 64.0 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 158 hp 118 kW |
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo has 8 hp more than Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI and Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 1,278 kg 2,818 lb |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 8.6 s |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo and Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI and Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 926 km 575 mi |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 814 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.6 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 158 hp 118 kW | 8.5 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenT-Roc IFacelift 20221.5 TSI | MitsubishiASX II1.3 Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 158 hp 118 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 270 Nm 199 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,278 kg 2,818 lb | 1,345 kg 2,965 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 926 km 575 mi | 814 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | 536 L 18.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI | Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen T-Roc I Facelift 2022 1.5 TSI
- Is 67 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 112 km (70 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mitsubishi ASX II 1.3 Turbo
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 91 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























