Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 200dvsFord Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Puma · Facelift 2024
1.0 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
- Fastest top speed204 km/h127 mph
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range852 km530 mi
- Largest trunk570 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Most powerful155 hp116 kW
- Lightest1,293 kg2,851 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,655kg3,649lb | 1,293kg2,851lb |
| Gross weight | 2,230kg4,916lb | 1,835kg4,045lb |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.7s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.2s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 73.6s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 8.7s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.7s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 852km530mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 999cc61cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,186mm165in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | - |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,550mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,588mm102in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,567mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,526mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 163mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 570L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,805L | 1,216L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 42L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d: Power / Torque
- Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 3,400-4,400 rpm | 1,400-3,200 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6,000 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.7 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.2 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 73.6 s | - |
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 14.0 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.7 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 137 km/h 85 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 150 hp 112 kW |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW |
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 200 km/h 124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 9.2 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 852 km 530 mi |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.2 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.7 s | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 9.2 s |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d | FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.2 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 204 km/h 127 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | 1,293 kg 2,851 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 852 km 530 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 570 L 20.1 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d | Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 186 km (115 mi) more estimated range
- Has 114 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 362 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























