Car comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 200d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024

1.0 EcoBoost

155 hp999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023

GLB 200d

150 hp1950 ccDieselFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2023-2025

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph Unrestricted
    200 km/h
    124 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    155 hp
    116 kW
  • Lightest
    1,293 kg
    2,851 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    120 hp/t
    89 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d

  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    852 km
    530 mi
  • Largest trunk
    570 L
  • Best overall score
    56/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
Power
155hp116kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,293kg2,851lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Gross weight
1,835kg4,045lb
2,230kg4,916lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
204 km/h
127 mph
To 99% top speed
80.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
88.4s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.7s
9.2s
0-200 km/h
50.6s
Calculated
73.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.2s
Calculated
8.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.3s
Calculated
16.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
667km414mi
Calculated
852km530mi
Calculated
Displacement
999cc61cu in
1,950cc119cu in
Length
4,186mm165in
4,634mm182in
Width
1,805mm71in
1,834mm72in
Height
1,550mm61in
1,697mm67in
Wheelbase
2,588mm102in
2,829mm111in
Front track
1,567mm62in
1,604mm63in
Rear track
1,526mm60in
1,604mm63in
Ground clearance
163mm6in
135mm5in
Trunk volume
456L
570L
Max trunk volume
1,216L
1,805L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
42L
52L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200dPowerTorque
  • Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost6,000 rpm2,500 rpm6,250 rpm
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d3,400-4,400 rpm1,400-3,200 rpm4,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.2 s
8.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.7 s
9.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.6 s
73.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
204 km/h
127 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
10.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.3 s
16.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
137 km/h
85 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
150 hp
112 kW

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d and Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
1,655 kg
3,649 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
204 km/h
127 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
91 hp/t
68 kW/t
11.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
667 km
414 mi
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
852 km
530 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
155 hp
116 kW
8.7 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
150 hp
112 kW
9.2 s
204 km/h
127 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
Power
155 hp
116 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.2 s
Top speed
204 km/h
127 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.7 s
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
9.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoost
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
91 hp/t
68 kW/t
11.0 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordPumaFacelift 20241.0 EcoBoostMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 200d
Power
155 hp
116 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.7 s
9.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
204 km/h
127 mph
Lightness
1,293 kg
2,851 lb
1,655 kg
3,649 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,186 mm
164.8 in
Height
1,550 mm
61.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Length
4,634 mm
182.4 in
Height
1,697 mm
66.8 in
Range score
667 km
414 mi
852 km
530 mi
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
570 L
20.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
120 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
91 hp/t
68 kW/t
11.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoostMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Puma Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 5 hp more
  • Is 362 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 200d

  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 186 km (115 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 114 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Puma 1.0 EcoBoost
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) GLB 200d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ford Puma · Facelift 2024 1.0 EcoBoost vs Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 200d - car comparison - FastVsFaster